|
While conducting a gastropexy, when placing the anchor, the wire broke.The same happened with 2 successive kits of the same lot number.The wires and anchors could not be kept as they fell into the stomach and were washed away in the digestive tract.The user facility was able to successfully complete the gastropexy with the (b)(4) kit.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation.A review of complaint history, inspection of unused product, device record history, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, documentation, drawing, quality control and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The device is shipped with an instruction for use (ifu) that describes the intended use, specific items are addressed such as: for placement, the ifu states as follows: "while maintaining slight tension on the trailing suture, introduce the distal spring coil of the wire guide into the needle and use it to push the anchor out of the needle into the stomach cavity.Maintain slight tension on the suture during anchor introduction.Remove the introducer needle over the wire guide.With the wire guide still in position, apply traction to the suture to pull the anterior wall of the stomach against the abdominal wall." the customer returned three opened packages and four sealed packages.Two of the opened packages were empty.The third opened package only contained a wire guide.The four sealed packages were unopened, unused gias-srm-2 sets from the same lot number as the complaint devices, lot 6471136.The visual examination reported the returned devices were manufactured correctly and dimensionally to specifications.The rtv in the suture anchor was present as specified.We then applied tension to the suture by holding the anchor between two fingers of one hand and wrapping the suture around a finger of the other hand.We pulled the suture tightly but were not able to break it and the suture remained in the anchor.Next we applied tension to the suture by holding the anchor between two fingers of one hand as before, but pulled on the bolster rather than the suture.The suture broke at the exit of the bolster with significantly lower force required than was originally placed on the suture when we pulled between the suture and the anchor.While the customer did not return the bolster to verify that this may have occurred in this case, it is reasonable to suggest that pulling on the bolster led to the failure of the device.It is reasonable to suggest that the sutures were broken by pulling on the bolster of the device not the suture as specified in the ifu.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
|
|
While conducting a gastropexy, when placing the anchor, the wire broke.The same happened with 2 successive kits of the same lot number.The wires and anchors could not be kept as they fell into the stomach and were washed away in the digestive tract.The user facility was able to successfully complete the gastropexy with the 3rd kit.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|