• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. CONTINUOUS NERVE BLOCK KIT; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. CONTINUOUS NERVE BLOCK KIT; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number AB-05060-PK
Device Problem Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/14/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device reportedly is unavailable for investigation at this time.The manufacturer will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
Reported event: on (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent a left subtalar fusion, bma and autograft.The anesthesiologist utilized the stimucath continuous nerve block procedural kit for administration of medication for pain.Per the physician's instructions, once the medication had been administered from the pain pump, the patient's husband was to remove the catheter.The patient's husband describes the removal process as pulling 2-3 inches then noticing that there was a wire/string still implanted into the patient's thigh; he continued to pull the catheter another 4-6 inches then stopped out of concern that something went wrong.The husband called the doctor's office and was instructed to continue pulling the catheter firmly.As further attempts to pull the catheter as instructed, he noticed that the extension was coming out of the middle of the catheter.Once the wire/string was fully extended and the husband called the doctor's office again and was again instructed to continue to pull on the catheter firmly.After further unsuccessful attempts to remove the catheter, he took the patient to the emergency room.The emergency room physician unsuccessfully attempted removal of the catheter then ordered the patient be returned to the original hospital that implanted the catheter.On arrival the anesthesiologist unsuccessfully attempted to pull the catheter out.The catheter was surgically removed the next day.The patient's condition is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) no lot number was provided.A device history record review was based upon a lot number from sales history data.A device history record review was performed on the stimicath catheter with no relevant findings.The ifu for this kit, b-05060-101d; rev.03, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu warns the user, "never tug or quickly pull on catheter during removal from patient to reduce risk of catheter breakage.During catheter removal, if resistance is encountered, stop; reposition patient and attempt removal again.Pressure on skin in the opposite direction from direction catheter is being pulled often helps to facilitate removal." a corrective action is not required at this time as a potential root cause could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.No lot number was provided.A device history record review was performed based upon a lot number from sales history data.A device history record review was performed on the catheter with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.The potential other remarks: cause of catheter being difficult to remove could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.Results - no result code available that could accurately describe that the complaint was confirmed, but the root cause is unknown.
 
Event Description
Reported event: on (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent a left subtalar fusion, bma and autograft.The anesthesiologist utilized the stimucath continuous nerve block procedural kit for administration of medication for pain.Per the physician's instructions, once the medication had been administered from the pain pump, the patient's husband was to remove the catheter.The patient's husband describes the removal process as pulling 2-3 inches then noticing that there was a wire/string still implanted into the patient's thigh; he continued to pull the catheter another 4-6 inches then stopped out of concern that something went wrong.The husband called the doctor's office and was instructed to continue pulling the catheter firmly.As further attempts to pull the catheter as instructed, he noticed that the extension was coming out of the middle of the catheter.Once the wire/string was fully extended and the husband called the doctor's office again and was again instructed to continue to pull on the catheter firmly.After further unsuccessful attempts to remove the catheter, he took the patient to the emergency room.The emergency room physician unsuccessfully attempted removal of the catheter then ordered the patient be returned to the original hospital that implanted the catheter.On arrival the anesthesiologist unsuccessfully attempted to pull the catheter out.The catheter was surgically removed the next day.The patient's condition is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTINUOUS NERVE BLOCK KIT
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
312 commerce place
asheboro NC 27203
Manufacturer Contact
jasmine brown
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
9193614124
MDR Report Key5667551
MDR Text Key45574581
Report Number1036844-2016-00256
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/19/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberAB-05060-PK
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-