On (b)(6) 2016: cook pneumothorax set was placed in the patient, and there was no problem.(no information of patient anatomy or access route, however the user used the device as usual.).On (b)(6) 2016: it was noticed that the catheter was separated from the hub.The catheter was replaced with another catheter of the same product.No adverse effect to the patient reported.
|
(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation: a review of complaint history, documentation, drawing, manufacturing instructions, quality control, specifications and a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The visual examination reported the hub was separated from the catheter.A review of the flare noted scratches and damage.A review of the cap noted a thin line of catheter material still remains around the inner diameter of the cap.The suspected lot number from the customer is #629333, the manufacturing record for this suspected lot was reviewed, and nothing of note was observed.Based on the information provided and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.However, it is feasible to suggest that twisting and pulling on the catheter could cause the flared portion to be pulled and removed from the hub.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment (qera) no further action is required.
|
On (b)(6) 2016: cook pneumothorax set was placed in the patient, and there was no problem.(no information of patient anatomy or access route, however the user used the device as usual.) on (b)(6) 2016: it was noticed that the catheter was separated from the hub.The catheter was replaced with another catheter of the same product.No adverse effect to the patient reported.
|