It was reported on 04/28/2016 that during a replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2016 (replacement housed in file (b)(4)).The or specialist called to return a generator that was opened but not used during the replacement surgery.It was stated that the generator was opened in the or, interrogated, programmed, put in the patient, re-interrogated and was the battery was dead.The surgeon was using cautery.The generator was received for analysis on 05/10/2016.Product analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.
|
Product analysis for the generator was completed and approved on 05/26/2016.Review of the data downloaded from the pulse generator indicated that the pulse disabled byte was set to a value that represents a vbat's eos threshold condition.However, burn marks were observed on the pulse generator case, indicating that the pulse generator may have been exposed to an electro-cautery tool during device implant/explant, which may have been a contributing factor.A reset of the pulsedisabled bit in the generator memory was performed to allow for an output to once again be provided by the generator for subsequent testing.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.
|