• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS LEAD MODEL 304

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS LEAD MODEL 304 Back to Search Results
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
An article titled "complications and safety of vagus nerve stimulation ¿ 25 years¿ experience at a single center¿ was published and the abstract was reviewed, which included adverse events involving vns patients.In many procedures performed between 1990 and 2014, patients suffered from complications related to vns surgery.The article reports of thirteen lead malfunctions in 12 patients (no children).Lead exploration to try to salvage the lead was required in 5 cases, 1 was successful and the remaining resulted in replacements.In 2 adult patients, an immediate postoperative lead disconnection was suspected, resulting in an early surgical reconnection.This was probably due to unsuccessful connection between the lead and stimulator during primary surgery.It is unclear if the surgeon performed a proper lead test in these cases.Not all lead fractures were visible on radiography, and the lead failures were mainly detected by diminished function, e.G., increased seizure frequency and increased impedance measurement leading to revision or replacement of the lead.Only a few were detected on radiography, and the etiology of high impedance is not entirely clear.Some have described lead failure in the absence of visible fractures as ¿microlesions¿ within the lead cable others have presented significant scar tissue around the as a possible cause of high impedance.We report 13 cases (3.0%) of lead malfunction, of which no children were involved.Previous studies report 0.5% to 20.8%.The present reports of patient ((b)(6) at first implant) had a high lead impedance (lead failure or significant scar tissue) which was detected by diminished function (increased seizure frequency/increased impedance measurement).The patient had a full revision surgery in 1 session after 3.4 years.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 304
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5694084
MDR Text Key47721236
Report Number1644487-2016-01190
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received05/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-