(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the distal end of the grandslam guide wire was in the left circumflex coronary artery, but the proximal end became contaminated when it touched the floor.The physician shortened the grandslam guide wire by cutting it.The 2.0x20 mini trek was unable to be loaded on to the guide wire because of the cut on the wire.The tip of the mini trek became kinked during the attempt to load it.With a subsequent attempt to load the mini trek, the mini trek was perforated by the grandslam, 3 mm from the tip of the mini trek.Another mini trek was successfully loaded on the same grandslam guide wire without further incident.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|