• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 52969
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 05/06/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Coopersurgical inc.Is currently investigating the reported complaint condition.The device involved in the complaint has not yet been returned by the customer for evaluation.Once the investigation is completed a follow-up report will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Summary surgery/procedure event (b)(6).Incident description: leep procedure, grounding pad located on upper left thigh, plugged into machine, when the physician was using cutting feature at 46w power there were no issues, and then unit was switched over to cautery tool, unit power was set at 36w, halfway through the procedure when using ball to cauterize, patient jumped and claimed of pain, insulated speculum in place, dr withdrew cauterize tool and observed 2 burned spots on sides of procedure area.Procedure was immediately halted and different methods were used to treat patient nature of injury - burn.Location of injury on body - vagina.Harm - temporary, intervention needed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Ref e-complaint-(b)(4).Please find attached the leep 1000 final mdr submission package, regarding all initial mdr's, and retro review initial mdr's filed for reports of intermittent function during use.The documents included in this package are as follows: · leep system investigation summary · leep 1000 tech bulletin cover letter · tech service bulletin 12151 · project #(b)(4)- leep system 1000 root cause.This concludes coopersurgical' s root cause investigation.Coopersurgical, inc.Will continue to monitor the complaint condition for tending and safety.
 
Event Description
Summarysurgery/procedure event (b)(4).Incident description: leep procedure, grounding pad located on upper left thigh, plugged into machine, when the physician was using cutting feature at 46w power there were no issues, and then unit was switched over to cautery tool, unit power was set at 36w, halfway through the procedure when using ball to cauterize, patient jumped and claimed of pain, insulated speculum in place, dr withdrew cauterize tool and observed 2 burned spots on sides of procedure area.Procedure was immediately halted and different methods were used to treat patient.Nature of injury - burn, location of injury on body - vagina, harm - temporary, intervention needed.Reference e-complaint (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEEP SYSTEM
Type of Device
LEEP SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer Contact
nana banafo
75 coporate drive
trumbull, CT 06611
2036015200
MDR Report Key5736723
MDR Text Key48733319
Report Number1216677-2016-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HGI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model Number52969
Device Catalogue Number52969
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/25/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/09/2005
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-