|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a broken guidewire was inconclusive because the original complaint sample was not returned for evaluation.The product returned for evaluation was one nitinol guidewire.The distal weld tip appeared intact and the sample appeared unremarkable.The wire measured 50cm in length and 0.018¿ in diameter, both of which were within manufacturing specifications.Tactile inspection of the sample was unremarkable.Microscopic inspection of the sample confirmed that the weld tip was intact and unremarkable.No damage or defects were observed along the length of the wire.No damage or defect was observed during evaluation of the returned sample; however, the event description indicated that the original complaint sample was not available for inspection.An undamaged sample was returned to bard access systems for evaluation.Consequently this complaint is inconclusive at this time.A lot history review (lhr) of reap0614 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|