An implant card was received showing the patient was re-implanted with a new generator and lead on (b)(6) 2016.The generator and lead were later received by the manufacturer for product analysis.During lead product analysis, a lead break was not confirmed.However, it should be noted that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.What appeared to be specs of white deposits were observed in various locations.Energy dispersion spectroscopy was performed on the deposit and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, sulphur, and calcium.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Based on the findings in the pa lab, there was no evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portions of the lead which may have contributed to the reported high impedance.Product analysis for the returned generator was also completed and found that the generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the generator.
|