• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
It was reported the patient was found to have high lead impedance on (b)(6) 2016.The patient denied any trauma which may have caused the device failure.Chest x-rays were ordered and a battery life calculation was performed to see if the patient would need a full vns revision.A battery life calculation was performed which showed the device had approximately 1.4 years remaining until neos = yes (near end of service).The programming history database was reviewed; however, only information from 10/27/2010 through 12/15/2015 was available.No anomalies were noted within the available information.Information was later received confirming that the patient did have high impedance on (b)(6) 2016.
 
Event Description
An implant card was received showing the patient was re-implanted with a new generator and lead on (b)(6) 2016.The generator and lead were later received by the manufacturer for product analysis.During lead product analysis, a lead break was not confirmed.However, it should be noted that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.What appeared to be specs of white deposits were observed in various locations.Energy dispersion spectroscopy was performed on the deposit and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, sulphur, and calcium.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Based on the findings in the pa lab, there was no evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portions of the lead which may have contributed to the reported high impedance.Product analysis for the returned generator was also completed and found that the generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the generator.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5793446
MDR Text Key50409192
Report Number1644487-2016-01585
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2005
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number8773
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/29/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2003
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
-
-