• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-FEM-CELECT
Device Problems Material Erosion (1214); Difficult to Remove (1528); Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Injury (2348); No Information (3190)
Event Date 06/14/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2016032. (b)(4). It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿tilt, vena cava perforation, device unable to be retrieved". Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c. F. R. 803. 56. Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported. Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e. G. , a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter. There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae. E. G. Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae. In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae. Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period. Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult. This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs. Complex. Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques. No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e. G. Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4). Catalog#: unknown but refered to as a cook celect filter. Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374 or k090140. Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on or about (b)(6) 2011 at (b)(6) medical center in (b)(6)". Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation. Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4). Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on or about (b)(6) 2011. " patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation. Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4). Catalog#: igtcfs-65-1-fem-celect. It has not been possible to investigate this event based on the limited information, and we are closing the report until further information is received. If additional information is received, the report will be re-opened for further investigation.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on or about (b)(6) 2011. " patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation. Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4). The event is currently under investigation. A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on 08/11/2016 as follows: plaintiff allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2011 due to blood clot in legs. Plaintiff alleges attempted retrieval on (b)(6) 2012. Plaintiff is alleging tilt, vena cava perforation, device unable to be retrieved.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameCOOK CELECT NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of DeviceDTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA 4632
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
Manufacturer Contact
thomas hessner kirk
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632, IN 47404
8004574500
MDR Report Key5793629
MDR Text Key249537678
Report Number3002808486-2016-00726
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/01/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator
Device Expiration Date01/27/2014
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-FEM-CELECT
Device Lot NumberE2696981
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/07/2016
Device Age16 MO
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received01/31/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Answer Provided
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 07/14/2016 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-