(b)(4).(b)(6).This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.It was further determined that the motor was defective.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to improper cleaning and maintenance, which is user error, misuse, and / or abuse.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was discovered that the motor seized, blocked, jammed and was moving heavy on the compact air drive device.It was further determined that the return pressurizing lock was blocked.It was further determined that the clutch was blocked and the motor was rusted, wet and had dirty air.It was observed that the device was internally very dirty (wash and poor treatment).It was further determined during the pre-repair diagnostics assessment that the device failed for general condition, check the attachment coupling, check cannulation, check attachment coupling with attachments, check reverse locking mechanism, check function of soft mode switch (safety system),check triggers for forward/reverse mode, check for untrue running, check for excessive noise, check the power with test bench: min.110 to 160 w and for check starting behavior.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|