Catalog Number 03.630.144 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It is unknown if there was patient involvement.Date of event: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.On an unknown date the device was received.(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Supplier: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: july 02, 2015.No anomalies were detected during device history record review.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that two instruments with broken tips received.The information surrounding the breakage of the instruments is unknown.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Update 18.July 16, material received on 15.July 16.Additional updated information received 25.July 16.The tips broke during surgery.The patient harm was (prolongation of surgery in minutes, reoperation, etc.) no impact on surgery and patient.No information on patient data (patient identifier, age or date of birth, gender, weight, comorbidities - smoker, obese etc.) fragment(s) were generated and the fragment(s) removed easily without additional intervention or difficult and required no additional intervention with no fragment left in the patient.Procedure was successfully completed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported there was patient involvement; however, patient information is unknown a product investigation was completed: one awl was found broken.The broken part is missing.The second awl is partially distorted and bent at the flutes.Based on the investigation results and the received information we cannot determine the exact root cause.Due to the wear and tear signs on the devices, it is likely that these products were intensively used.The microscopic view of the broken surface shows a homogenous surface what indicates material conformity.Because of the damage on both devices, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy of the valid manufacturing specifications.The article in question was produced in july 2015.It is likely that both awls have had interference with a metallic device during use and this impact has probably led to these damages as result.It was concluded that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.No product fault could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|