Catalog Number 42530007901 |
Device Problems
Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 09/12/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report will be amended when our investigation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is reported that the patient is alleging harm caused by the device and requires revision; however, the nature of the harm is unknown at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report will be amended when our investigation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
It has now been reported that the patient revised due to pain and possible loosening.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient underwent a left knee revision procedure approximately three years post implantation due to pain and loosening.Operative report received indicated the revision was due to mechanical loosening of the tibial component.Operative report further states that the femoral and patellar components were well fixed but the tibia was not, noting no bony growth on the tibial pegs and approximately 50% growth on the back of the tibial component.The tibia and articular surface were removed and replaced.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical product: femur trabecular metal cruciate retaining (cr) standard porous, catalog #42502806201, lot #62347268.Articular surface fixed bearing cruciate retaining (cr) left 12 mm height, catalog #42512000612, lot #62380358.The reported event was confirmed through review of operative notes received.Operative notes from the revision surgery state that the patient was revised due to mechanical loosening of the tibial component.It was noted that the pegs appeared to have no bony ingrowth.The back side was noted to have 50% bony ingrowth and 50% fibrous ingrowth.The patellar and femoral components were noted to be well fixed and were not revised.Device history record was reviewed and no discrepancies were found.A field action was previously conducted in which zimmer voluntarily removed the persona trabecular metal tibial implant from the field due to a higher than anticipated complaint rate for radiolucent lines and loosening.The capa investigation determined that the likely root causes for the higher than anticipated complaint rate are that the persona tm tibia allows the potential for the tibial implant to sit proud on the resected tibial surface and the persona tm tibia has less initial stability than predicate devices.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|