|
As part of the preserve-zenith iliac branch clinical study being conducted by cook, inc., the following event was noted: it was reported that on the 12-month follow-up computed tomography scan, the stent was noted to be occluded.The facility indicated that both the internal iliac arm of the branch graft and the icast were involved.According to the site - "poor outflow/runoff of internal iliac artery most likely cause".
|
|
Engineering analysis: the details provided indicate that during the (b)(6) clinical study by cook, it was reported that on the 12-month follow-up ct scan, the icast stent was noted to be occluded.In the image provided by the institution the stent appears to have a slight buckle to it but does not appear to be occluded.A series of questions were sent to the institution to obtain more specific details of the case.They were as follows.So was poor runoff to the iliac artery (ia) from the common iliac the cause of occlusion of the icast at the distal segment of the ia? or did the study product and study procedure cause the occlusion? how does the core lab know that the occlusion is within the icast? the icast appears straight and fully dilated per the image provided.Are there other views to verify that the stent is not kinked or buckled what were the flows in the ia after the stent was placed in the ia arm.Were they equal to what is considered good flow? was the patient on anti-platelet, aspirin, coumadin etc.After placement and when occlusion was detected? the response from the institution was as follows: "unfortunately, the only definite information that i can provide is that the patient has been on plavix since the date of the procedure." the additional details provided, or lack thereof, did not aid into the investigation.Additional images were received.Images of the case were received and reviewed.In all cases regarding the images there was no definitive images indicating that the stent was occluded.There is a possibility that the stent had a slight buckle but is subjective based on the angle that the images were taken from.Engineering summary: a full review of the catheter lot history records for the device in question was performed.The records indicate that this lot of catheters passed atriums final lot qualification testing.This inspection requires that the catheter lot must pass the following: ability of the stent and delivery system to be passed through the labeled introducer sheath.Ability to deploy the stent at nominal pressure (8atm).Ability to withdraw the deflated balloon catheter back through the labeled introducer sheath ability of the delivery system to withstand 10 inflate/deflate cycles at the rated burst pressure (12atm) without leaks or failures.Balloon burst testing.The balloon must burst over the rated burst pressure specified on the label (12atm).Manifold to shaft tensile testing.Samples when tensile tested must not break or separate below 3.37lbs.Result: all quality inspection samples passed this final inspection without any non-conformances noted during the final lot qualification testing.Conclusion: based on the details of the event there is no conclusive evidence that the icast covered stent was occluded.There is a possibility that the stent had a slight buckle but is subjective based on the angle that the images were taken from.Clinical evaluation: restenosis or reocclusion of a stented lesion is a possible complication associated with percutaneous transluminal angiographic procedures.The causes may be the result of several things including, but not limited to, the stent being place in a location that is compressed by body movements, patient non-compliance with prescribed anti-thrombin/anti platelet regimens post procedure or even the progression of the patient's disease.The instructions for use state "complications and adverse events can occur when using any endoluminal device including, but not limited to, occlusion.".
|