|
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic hernia procedure, the tip of the blades of the device did not meet.This occurred inside the patient.To correct the condition, another device was used.No other known adverse events were reported.
|
|
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) and engineering led an evaluation of one device opened by the account.This evaluation was based on a technical review of all data received from the site, a pmv review of manufacturing records, a pmv review of complaint trends, an engineering evaluation, and an evaluation of the returned device.The jaws opened and closed without any hang ups noted.The jaws failed to cut the appropriate test media.Upon close analysis of the blades engineering noted that only the tip met during actuation.There was a significant gap between the proximal to the tip of the blades.Engineering also noted a bent blade.The bent blade assembly can be replicated by pushing the assembly against a hard surface.Visual testing of the returned product confirmed the product did not meet quality release specifications that were tested regarding the reported conditions due to the damaged blade.Replication of the bent blade assembly can be replicated by pushing the assembly against a hard surface.A review of the device history record indicates this device lot number was released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on the product analysis, the failure was confirmed to be attributed to the reported event.The file will be closed as a misuse of the product.Should new information become available, the file will be re-opened and the investigation summary will be amended as appropriate.
|