• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES CTR73 12X100 KII OPT ZTHR 6/BX; GCJ

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES CTR73 12X100 KII OPT ZTHR 6/BX; GCJ Back to Search Results
Model Number CTR73
Device Problem Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/27/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The incident device is anticipated to return.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of the investigation.In accordance to 21 cfr 803.56, if we obtain additional information, which was not known or was not available when the initial report was submitted, then the supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.There is no report of serious injury or death associated with this event.
 
Event Description
Procedure performed - unknown."this is a complaint from the market.(b)(4).Please refer to the complaint sheet for investigation.Report from the sales rep - the customer felt strong resistance when inserting a stapler 'echelon' made by ethicon through this event product.He/she needed more strong power than as usual in inserting the device.He/she has never experienced this incident since becoming a (b)(4) customer.The sales rep had difficulty in asking the model number of the stapler to make sure if the diameter was acceptable.Initial investigation report by (b)(4) - the event unit was returned to olympus and visually inspected.It confirmed that we felt more resistance than some seals of the same trocar model, when inserting a bar with the diameter size approx.1cm, as the customer mentioned.The septum was found to be torn indicated by a red arrow in the left picture.Very small multiple scratches were present on the mouth of the cannula below in the right picture.Other than those, no visible damage and no foreign material were found with the double duck bill and shield.The unit will be returned to amr for further evaluation.(b)(4).Requests: the customer would like to know the following point.Please include answers to this question in the closing letter.1 to investigate if the event septum and shield had appropriate flexibility, compared to conforming products." patient status - "no patient injury".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: the event unit was returned for evaluation.Upon inspection, engineering noted no visible damage to the exterior, duckbill, shield, or seal housing.The duckbill was removed and it was confirmed that the septum was torn.Engineering could not confirm the customer's experience of "strong resistance." the tear in the septum may have decreased resistance during testing; however, grease that would have prevented abnormal resistance was also found to be present.The root cause of the drag force is unknown because engineering was unable to replicate the customer's experience.The root cause of the septum tear was likely due to the protruding tabs of a stapler inserted in the trocar.All seals are thoroughly inspected and tested 100% for leakage during the manufacturing process.There is always a potential to tear or dislodge the internal seal components with multiple passes of instruments, especially with sharp or angular devices.The instructions for use (ifu) warns, "extra care should be used when inserting angular and asymmetrical instruments.All instruments should be centered axially when inserted through the seal to prevent tearing." applied medical has opened a corrective and preventative action (capa) to further elevate and track this investigation and implement appropriate corrective actions to mitigate this type of event.In accordance with 21 cfr 803.56, if additional information is obtained which was not known or was not available when this report was submitted, then the supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CTR73 12X100 KII OPT ZTHR 6/BX
Type of Device
GCJ
Manufacturer (Section D)
APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita CA 92688
Manufacturer Contact
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita, CA 92688
9497138233
MDR Report Key5844928
MDR Text Key51122002
Report Number2027111-2016-00557
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier00607915123680
UDI-Public(01)00607915123680(17)181029(30)01(10)1258481
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K060096
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/03/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date10/29/2018
Device Model NumberCTR73
Device Catalogue Number101291101
Device Lot Number1258481
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-