|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties and foreign body in patient appear to be due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the electronic complaint handling database revealed no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|