|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a frayed guidewire was confirmed; however, the exact cause remains unknown.The product returned for evaluation was two photographs which depicted a nitinol guidewire.Usage residues were apparent on the guidewire in both photographs.A break was evident in the core wire distal of the transition.The outer coil wire was elongated.It could not be determined if the weld tip was attached to the distal end of the coil wire.While guidewire damage was apparent in the supplied photographs, inspection of those photographs was insufficient to identify the cause of the damage.Consequently this complaint is confirmed as ¿cause unknown¿ at this time.Possible contributors to the observed damage include retraction of the guidewire against the introducer needle and attempted insertion of the guidewire through a tortuous path.A lot history review (lhr) of rezf2583 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from these lot numbers.
|
|
It was reported that during the process of insertion of the picc, the guidewire was introduced half way, then did not progress.During guidewire removal, allegedly it presented a lot of resistance and when it was removed, this was with the tip frayed.
|