|
After a successful procedure, the user facility noticed an endoleak in the graft.After taking one more shot with the catheter in the leg extension it showed a type 3 endoleak with a clearl blush from the leg extension into the iliac aneurysm.The leak was reportedly repaired by using an additional leg extension.After the new leg extension, there was no endoleak visible.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Investigation: a review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, specification, and trends were used during the investigation of this event.According to the complaint information, the graft developed a type iiib endoleak.Due to limited information given, it is not possible to determine the exact root cause.Although the complaint report states that there were no anatomical concerns and that ballooning was done according to procedure, it is possible that the patient had slightly tortuous or calcified anatomy that pulled at the suture holes, causing them to increase in size.Ballooning against calcified anatomy can also cause the fabric around the suture holes to be stretched, therefore, widening the holes.Suture elongations may also be caused by incorrect suturing technique.Suture leaks or small material holes are associated with increased pressure in the graft and the presence of anticoagulants, which are standard for aaa procedures.According to the ifu, the physician should position the angiographic catheter just above the level of the renal arteries during the final angiogram.If the physician performed the angiogram injection directly into the leg, instead of above the body as stated in the ifu, this could have created a momentary pressure wave through the device.This increase in graft pressure could have caused or increased the leak.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|