|
The product was not returned for inspection.The patient was enrolled in a clinical study (b)(6).The patient had a 120/150 smart sfa 7 x 150 stent implanted successfully during the study index procedure with no reported issue.The target lesion was the middle portion of the left femoral artery.The rate of stenosis was unknown.No additional target lesion characteristic information was provided.Approximately thirty-five months after the index procedure, a slight fracture (fracture type 1) of the middle part of the stent was noted during an x-ray checkup.No treatment was applied or provided.The patient has not been recovered.It was unknown if the patient was symptomatic as a result of the reported product issue/stent fracture noted.There was no reported restenosis of the stent noted.No other follow-up is scheduled for the patient as a result of the reported product issue.The following information was requested but was reported to be unknown: is there any additional target lesion characteristic information available; what is the patient¿s medical history; what was the patient¿s medical regimen post-procedure; was the patient compliant with the medical regimen.No additional information is available.The product was not returned for analysis.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 15844403 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿stent fractured-in patient (peripheral)¿ could not be confirmed as the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause could not be determined.Vessel characteristics are unknown.There are multiple factors that can contribute to stent fracture in the sfa.The sfa is a very dynamic vessel that undergoes biomechanical forces such as flexion, torsion, compression, and elongation.Studies have also revealed that nitinol stent fractures occurred in cases of multiple stents and overlap related to an abnormal stress area that is created.The cumulative length of the stented segment unequivocally has been identified as the most important determinant for material fatigue and subsequent fracture.According to the instructions for use ¿after careful inspection of the pouch looking for damage to the sterile barrier, carefully peel open the pouch and extract the stent/delivery system from the tray.Examine the device for any damage.If it is suspected that the sterility or performance of the device has been compromised, the device should not be used.Advance the device over the guidewire to the lesion site.Note: if resistance is met during delivery system introduction, the system should be withdrawn and another system should be used.Unlock the tuohy borst valve connecting the inner shaft and outer sheath of the delivery system.Initiate stent deployment by retracting the outer sheath while holding the inner shaft in a fixed position.While using fluoroscopy, maintain position of the radiopaque stent markers relative to the targeted lesion site.Watch for the distal radiopaque markers to begin separating.Separation of the distal stent markers signals that the stent is unsheathed.Continue deploying the stent until the distal end of the stent obtains full apposition with the vessel wall.Continue deploying the stent until the proximal end of the stent obtains full apposition with the vessel wall.¿ neither the dhr nor the limited information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken.Please note that this is the initial/final report for this file.
|
|
As reported, the patient was enrolled in a clinical study (b)(6) and the case number is (b)(4).The patient had a 120/150 smart sfa 7 x 150 stent implanted successfully during the study index procedure with no reported issue.The target lesion was the middle portion of the left femoral artery.The rate of stenosis was unknown.No additional target lesion characteristic information was provided.Approximately thirty-five months after the index procedure, a slight fracture (fracture type 1) of the middle part of the stent was noted during an x-ray checkup.No treatment was applied/provided.The patient has not been recovered.It was unknown if the patient was symptomatic as a result of the reported product issue/stent fracture noted.There was no reported restenosis of the stent noted.No other follow-up is scheduled for the patient as a result of the reported product issue.The following information was requested but was reported to be unknown: is there any additional target lesion characteristic information available; what is the patient's medical history; what was the patient's medical regimen post-procedure; was the patient compliant with the medical regimen.No additional information is available.
|