• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 304

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 304 Back to Search Results
Model Number 304-20
Device Problem Low impedance (2285)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/01/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
It was reported that a vns patient's device showed low impedance at 600 ohms.No injuries, falls, or trauma were reported.It was stated by the patient's mother that they get efficacy from the magnet.The patient has been referred for full revision.Clinic notes were received indicating that the vns magnet was initially effective, but is now no longer effective.An increase in seizures since may 2016 was documented and was attributed to "vns dysfunction resulting in low impedance value on interrogation." the device had been programmed off on (b)(6) 2016.Lead and generator revision surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2016.A lead break was visualized approximately one-third of the distance from the generator.The explanted devices have not been received to-date.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Relevant tests/laboratory data, corrected data: the relevant test data was inadvertently not included in the initial report.
 
Event Description
The explanted devices were received for analysis on 10/05/2016.Analysis was performed on the returned lead portion 10/24/2016.The electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The outer silicone tubing appeared to be twisted and abraded openings were observed on the outer and inner silicone tubes.The coils were bare and exposed in the areas of the abraded openings.The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes.What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations.Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy was performed on the deposit observed on the outer silicone tubing and identified the deposit as containing silicon, sulphur and calcium.With the exception of the twisted appearance and abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with those that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Analysis was completed for the returned generator 10/27/2016.The downloaded from the generator shows an indication of decreased impedance, as the last >25% change in impedance value showed the pre-change impedance value was 63 ohms and the post-change value was 257 ohms, with a time of change detection on (b)(6) 2016.The device was explanted later on (b)(6) 2016.Review of the manufacturer's programming history database shows the last known diagnostic test was performed on (b)(6) 2016 with an impedance value of 1812 ohms.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.Magnet activations performed during output monitoring demonstrate the appropriate magnet output for the programmed settings.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery measured 3.055 volts and shows an intensified follow-up indicator was not set.18.519% of the battery had been consumed.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Review of the downloaded generator data revealed no anomalies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 304
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5916022
MDR Text Key54266614
Report Number1644487-2016-01958
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/01/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2017
Device Model Number304-20
Device Lot Number3686
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/05/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/01/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/30/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2016
10/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/30/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age9 YR
-
-