|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a break or cut in the button device is confirmed, but the exact cause is unknown.Three photographs of a button replacement device were provided for investigation.The photographs showed a break in the shaft of the button device.The first photograph shows the button dome and the distal portion of the shaft.The proximal portion of the shaft and the external bolster are not shown.The shaft and dome material is discolored.The cross section at the proximal end of the tube is uneven.The second photograph shows what could be the same device, but the dome and the proximal end of the attached shaft are cleaner than what is shown in the first photograph.Material is adhering to the external surface of both the dome and shaft.The 3rd photograph is similar to the 2nd, but the device has been rotated around the axis of the shaft.The fractured or cut surface is indistinguishable.It was reported that the button device was ¿cut¿ during removal.Possible causes of the damage include sharp instrument damage or overstretching.The product ifu provides three methods for removal ¿ traction, endoscopic, and surgical method.The traction removal method can be accomplished by placing an obturator through the feeding port down the center of the device to distend/elongate the button device¿s dome.It was reported that the button was stretched with ¿a kind of wire punch¿.Whether or not the obturator from the button kit was used, the damage appears to have occurred during use, but the exact mechanism of damage cannot be determined from the provided photographs.A lot history review (lhr) of huxg1668 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
It was reported that during removal of a bard gastric button without balloon, the health professional pressed to stretch the device with a kind of wire ¿punch¿ to remove the button, but it was cut, being practically entirely inside the patient's abdomen.The patient submitted to stomach pain and difficulty making stools.The doctor said that he would eliminate it in a natural way between three days and a month.After 18 days, the button was naturally excreted.No patient injury reported.
|