It was reported that vns patient underwent a generator replacement.The reason mentioned on the implant card was "patient cut the incision".The lead impedance was ok after the replacement.The explanted generator was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.Further follow up indicated that the patient (mentally delayed) was implanted with the vns therapy since 2010 with positive outcome.He was admitted to the general hospital in the remote region on (b)(6) 2016, where they looked over the incision, they cleaned the wound, and stick dressing on the wound.While visiting the vns clinic as regular procedure to ramp up the device on (b)(6) 2016, they looked over the incision and found out the wound was open (patient was trying to remove out the device).The patient was admitted directly to the or for the next day on (b)(6) 2016 to clean and seal the wound.The neurosurgeon decided to replace the generator prophylactically; he cleaned the wound and changed the position of the generator in order not to have any infection.No explanted device is available to be returned to the manufacturer for analysis.The review of the manufacturing records confirmed the sterilization with (hp method) for the generator prior to the distribution.
|