It was later reported by the physician that the infection was first observed within the clinic on (b)(6) 2016.Due to this information, additional follow up was performed at which point it was explained that the patient had a subsequent infection and that the original infection was first observed on (b)(6) 2016.It was noted the family had called the physician's office on (b)(6) 2016 with a report of swelling, the patient went to the ed (emergency department) on (b)(6) 2016, and the generator device was replaced on (b)(6) 2016.During the replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2016, the chest wall was washed out and the patient was placed on a normal regimen of iv antibiotics.It was noted the believed cause of the infection was due to the placement of the device in the axillary region, as opposed to the chest, and the patient is in a wheelchair.It is felt that the sweat is a contributing factor in the wound getting infected.The information regarding the second infection has been reported in mfr.Report 1644487-2016-02467.
|