Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP |
Device Problems
Material Erosion (1214); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Hematoma (1884); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 12/18/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog number: unknown but referred to as a cook gunther tulip filter.Since catalog number is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or k121057.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2015." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a cook gunther tulip filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot# is unknown.Pma 510(k): since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or k121057.Mfg date: unknown as lot# is unknown.(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2015." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information was received 02/06/2017 and is as follows: patient alleges filter placed on (b)(6) 2015 for pe and dvt, with large clot burden in left lower extremity.Patient alleges outcomes attributed to device include vena cava perforation, psoas muscle perforation and hematoma, and filter erosion.Patient alleges successful retrieval attempt on (b)(6) 2015.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Exemption number (b)(4).William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of (b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "vena cava perforation, muscle perforation, filter erosion".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter perforation of the vena cava wall is a known risk reported in the published scientific literature.Also, published scientific literature describes that manipulation in the area of filter placement could contribute to changes to the filter configuration and placement thereby potentially initiate perforation of the vena cava wall.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Event Description
|
Dated 18dec2015, abdominal/pelvic ct reports, "hematoma compresses the ivc.There is an ivc filter.Two of the legs of the ivc filter do extend through the lumen posteriorly but this is not an uncommon finding with the ivc filters.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vc/organ perforation, filter erosion.Vena cava wall penetration/perforation has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Unknown if the reported filter erosion is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi) (b)(4).Registration no.: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|