• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CQF7554
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Rupture (1546); Cut In Material (2454)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/11/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will not be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported during an angioplasty procedure of a right arm fistula that during the sixth inflation, the pta balloon ruptured at approximately 20 atms.The health care provider removed the balloon in its entirety through the sheath without difficulty.The procedure was concluded, and no further treatment was provided.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.The lot met all release criteria.Visual/microscopic inspection: the balloon size for this product is printed on the hub and identified the returned sample as an 5mm x 4cm balloon.The balloon appeared to have been previously inflated.No anomalies were observed at this time.Functional/performance evaluation: the patency of the guidewire lumen was tested using a 0.035" in-house guidewire, and it passed without issue.The inflation hub was connected to an in-house inflation device.Water was used to inflate the balloon.Upon inflation, water was observed leaking from the proximal cone of the balloon.The balloon fibers were then stripped.The balloon was placed under microscopic magnification and a cut in the catheter and balloon was found at the proximal balloon glue joint.The cut was jagged in appearance.Medical records review: medical records were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.Conclusion: the sample was returned.The investigation is confirmed for a cut in the catheter and balloon.The investigation is inconclusive for a balloon rupture, as the balloon was unable to be fully inflated due to poor sample condition (i.E.Cut catheter and balloon).The definitive root cause for the cut in the outer catheter could not be determined based upon the available information.It is unknown whether the user perceived the cut in the outer catheter as a material rupture.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: - do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.- when the catheter is exposed to the vascular system, it should be manipulated while under high-quality fluoroscopic observation.Do not advance or retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation.Precautions: - if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the sheath and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.- if resistance is still felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter and guidewire/introducer sheath as a single unit.The event was reported via medwatch report#mw5063425.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported during an angioplasty procedure of a right arm fistula that during the sixth inflation, the pta balloon ruptured at approximately 20 atms.The health care provider removed the balloon in its entirety through the sheath without difficulty.The procedure was concluded, and no further treatment was provided.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONQUEST 40 PTA DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V.
blvd montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key5964549
MDR Text Key55211903
Report Number2020394-2016-00887
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083657
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCQF7554
Device Lot NumberREZG1844
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient Weight90
-
-