| Model Number |
HGKTP06/75CPUT (1) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Blood Loss (2597)
|
| Date of Event |
08/18/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report relates to one of the two devices involved in the event.The mfr report #1640201-2016-00027 relates to the other involved device.A review of the complaint device history records, including collagen coating records, indicated that the patch was processed and inspected according to procedures and no anomaly was found.Specifically, the review of the water permeability testing records of products coated on the same day and under the same conditions as the complaint device indicated values well within product specifications.One retention sample coated on the same period and under the same conditions as the complaint device underwent water permeability testing at 120mmhg as per iso 7198.The test result indicated a value well within product specifications.A remaining fragment of the involved patch will be sent to an outside an independent laboratory for macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy analysis.The investigation is still on-going.A follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During a surgery involving two vascular patches, it was reported that an important leakage was observed from the patch.The device was removed from the patient and the surgeon sutured the carotid to complete the procedure.No adverse consequence for the patient has been reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The remaining fragment of the involved patch was analysed by an outside and independent laboratory.It consisted of a macroscopic examination and a scanning electron microscopy analysis.The laboratory concluded that no significant abnormality such as large tears, loss of textile cohesion, holes and signs of cut were observed.The sem analysis corroborated the macroscopic analysis.The sem analysis pointed out focal infiltration of collagen material.No conclusion can be drawn.However, all available information and the product testing performed would tend to indicate that the device was not defective.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|