During review of the in-house programming/diagnostic history database, it was observed that high impedance was observed at office visit on (b)(6) 2015.It is unknown if any patient manipulation or trauma occurred that could have caused or contributed to the high impedance reading.Further follow-up found that the patient had been referred for generator replacement surgery.At the time, the surgeon did not want to replace the lead because he was concerned that there may not be enough room on the nerve for a new lead.However it is unclear how the surgeon made this assessment.The generator was replaced on (b)(6) 2015 and the existing lead was connected to the new generator.Following generator replacement a system diagnostic test observed high lead impedance with the newly implanted generator.Programming history indicated that as of (b)(6) 2016 the high impedance had not resolved.The physician was notified of the high lead impedance and the manufacturer's recommendations for addressing high lead impedance events.It was then reported that since the high impedance was observed the non-verbal patient has been agitated and experiencing dysphagia, loss of appetite and trouble sleeping.The device was programmed off on (b)(6) 2016.Following device disablement the patient's behavior and symptoms improved however the patient was still not eating well and appeared to be fearful of food.Attempts to obtain additional information have been unsuccessful to date.It is not known if the lead has been replaced to date.
|