• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC; INTRA- AORTIC BALLOOON PRODUCTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC; INTRA- AORTIC BALLOOON PRODUCTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IAB-S840C
Device Problems Inflation Problem (1310); Kinked (1339); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Ischemic Heart Disease (2493)
Event Date 08/30/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via a hotline call from the registered nurse (rn) in the cath lab.The iab was placed while the patient was in the cath lab.The patient is (b)(6).The iab was inserted via the patient's femoral artery without incident.They initiated pumping, and initially the pump started up and ran as expected.Five to ten minutes after start-up the pump began to alarm for high pressure.They had not been able to get the pump to run for longer than 1 or 2 minutes since then, and now it immediately alarmed every time they press on.The clinical support specialist (css) first verified that the alarms have all been high pressure alarms, no helium loss alarms, and no blood in the gas tubing.The css then had a discussion about the typical causes for high pressure alarms.The rn states that the insertion did not seem tortuous at all.There are no kinks in the gas tubing that they have been able to find.The patient is already off of the cath lab table and on the bed.The rn stated that the last shot of fluoro that they did showed that the balloon appeared to be in the right place.The css and rn discussed the possibility that the balloon could have migrated, and they should verify placement again.In the meantime the css also discussed possible kinking just inside the leg at the groin, and they had already tried to hyper-extend the hip with no change.The css had them try a different pump (160334w), but it also immediately alarmed for high pressure.They are going to move the patient back to the cath lab table at this point to check placement.The css asked the rn if he could call back in a few minutes.At 1410 - the css called back, and spoke again with the rn.The rn stated that the iab did appear to be in the correct place, but they have still not been able to get the pump to run.They then removed the iab without incident, and they do not plan on placing another.The patient remains stable at this time without the iabp.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation: the bladder membrane was wrapped in yellow padding.Blood was noted on the bladder membrane but not within.Dried blood was noted on the bifurcate.The distal end of the teflon sheath was located approximately 20cm from the distal tip of the catheter.No kinks, damage, or abnormalities were noted with the device.The one-way valve was tested and passed.A vacuum was pulled on the one-way valve and it held for at least 1 minute and then 30 seconds five separate times.The iab was submerged in water and leak tested.No holes or leaks were detected.The unit passed leak test.The iab was pump tested at 100mmhg for 10 minutes and no issues were noted.No high pressure alarms occurred.A lab inventory guidewire was front loaded through the luer end of the iab.Resistance was noted approximately 2.0cm from the luer end of the catheter.The guidewire was not able to advance.Some blood exited with the guidewire.The guidewire was back loaded through the iab distal tip.Resistance was noted approximately 43.5cm from the distal tip.The guidewire was able to advance slowly, but it was not able to advance past 66.0cm from the distal tip.Some blood exited with the guidewire.The central lumen was clotted with blood which likely caused the resistance.No kinks were able to be found on the device.A device history record (dhr) review was not performed.There was no confirmed product failure with the returned sample.Conclusion: the reported complaint of high pressure alarms is not confirmed.The reported complaint was not able to be duplicated during functional testing.The iab passed functional testing.The root cause of the complaint is undetermined.
 
Event Description
It was reported via a hotline call from the registered nurse (rn) in the cath lab.The iab was placed while the patient was in the cath lab.The patient is 5'9".The iab was inserted via the patient's femoral artery without incident.They initiated pumping, and initially the pump started up and ran as expected.Five to ten minutes after start-up the pump began to alarm for high pressure.They had not been able to get the pump to run for longer than 1 or 2 minutes since then, and now it immediately alarmed every time they press on.The clinical support specialist (css) first verified that the alarms have all been high pressure alarms, no helium loss alarms, and no blood in the gas tubing.The css then had a discussion about the typical causes for high pressure alarms.The rn states that the insertion did not seem tortuous at all.There are no kinks in the gas tubing that they have been able to find.The patient is already off of the cath lab table and on the bed.The rn stated that the last shot of fluoro that they did showed that the balloon appeared to be in the right place.The css and rn discussed the possibility that the balloon could have migrated, and they should verify placement again.In the meantime the css also discussed possible kinking just inside the leg at the groin, and they had already tried to hyper-extend the hip with no change.The css had them try a different pump (b)(4), but it also immediately alarmed for high pressure.They are going to move the patient back to the cath lab table at this point to check placement.The css asked the rn if he could call back in a few minutes.At 1410 - the css called back, and spoke again with the rn.The rn stated that the iab did appear to be in the correct place, but they have still not been able to get the pump to run.They then removed the iab without incident, and they do not plan on placing another.The patient remains stable at this time without the iabp.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC
Type of Device
INTRA- AORTIC BALLOOON PRODUCTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
9 plymouth street
everett MA 02149
Manufacturer Contact
anne rosenberger
2400 bernville road
reading, PA 19605
6104783117
MDR Report Key5978435
MDR Text Key55691646
Report Number1219856-2016-00223
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K981660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/26/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberIAB-S840C
Device Lot Number18F15K0005
Other Device ID Number00801902002679
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/23/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/19/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/05/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Weight119
-
-