| Catalog Number |
GR3508 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D4 - udi number is not required for this product code/lot number combination.The di number has been provided.The actual device has not been received at the manufacturing facility.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted no later than 30 days from the date that this report was sent.For this reason code 11 was used in the conclusions section of h6.A review of the device history record and the product release decision control sheet of the involved product code/lot # combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file did not find any other report with the involved product code/lot # combination.Terumo medical products (tmp) (importer) registration no.2243441 is submitting this report on behalf of ashitaka factory of terumo corporation (manufacturer) registration no.9681834.Exemption number e2015022.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The user facility reported that the coating had come off the wire.Follow up communication with the user facility confirmed the following information: the core of wire separated from outer coating at the distal tip; the coating and core split but did not break from the remaining wire, therefore no pieces were left behind in the patient; a new wire was opened and the procedure was completed successfully; and there was no patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow-up # 1 to provide a status update on the investigation.The actual device has not yet been received by the manufacturing facility for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete, but no later than 30 days from the date that this report was sent.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up # 2 to provide a status update on the investigation.The actual device has not yet been received by the manufacturing facility for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete, but no later than 30 days from the date that this report was sent.For this reason (b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up number 3 to provide a status update on the investigation.As of december 22, 2016 the actual sample has not been returned to the manufacturing facility.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete, but no later than 30 days from the date that this report was sent.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up number 4 to provide a status update on this report.The actual sample was not available for evaluation.A retention sample from the reported product code/lot number combination is currently being evaluated.A follow up will be submitted when the investigation is complete, but no later than 30 days from the date that this report was sent.For this reason (b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The retention sample from the reported product code/lot number combination was visually inspected.No anomalies were noted in the appearance.Magnifying inspection revealed no anomalies.The outer diameter of the shaft was measured and verified to meet manufacturing specification.The sample was peeled off the urethane outer layer from the wire intentionally for the purpose of checking the adhesion level of the urethane outer layer to the core wire.There was no lifting of the urethane outer layer or no gap between the core wire and the urethane outer layer.No anomalies were observed.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The investigation results verified that the retention sample was the normal product.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|