• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. ADVIA CENTAUR XP CA 19-9 ASSAY; IMMUNOLOGICAL TEST FOR CA 19-9 ANTIGEN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. ADVIA CENTAUR XP CA 19-9 ASSAY; IMMUNOLOGICAL TEST FOR CA 19-9 ANTIGEN Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/27/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The cause for the discordant advia centaur xp ca19-9 results is unknown.The customer did not run any other patient samples with lot 052384 and lot 052388.The customer has accepted ca19-9 lot 052388 for use.No results were questioned by physicians for lot 052384.The patient sample is not available for further testing and investigation at the manufacturer site.The instrument is performing within specifications.No further evaluation of the device is required.The ifu states in the interpretation of results section: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with patient's medical history, clinical presentation and other findings." the ifu states in the limitations section: "warning: do not use the advia centaur ca 19-9 assay as a screening test or for diagnosis.Do not predict disease recurrence solely on levels of advia centaur ca 19-9.Normal levels of advia centaur ca 19-9 do not always preclude the presence of disease.Note: do not interpret serum levels of ca 19-9 as absolute evidence of the presence or the absence of malignant disease.Before treatment, patients with confirmed gi carcinoma frequently have levels of ca 19-9 within the range observed in healthy individuals.Additionally, elevated levels of ca 19-9 can be observed in patients with nonmalignant diseases.Measurements of ca 19-9 should always be used in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures, including information from the patient's clinical evaluation.".
 
Event Description
A discordant high advia centaur xp ca 19-9 result was obtained for a patient sample during lot to lot correlation.The correlation run was between reagent lot 052384 and lot 052388.The results showed greater than 30% difference.The reagent lot 052388 was recalibrated and the patient sample was repeated.The result was higher than the initial result from lot 052384.Patient treatment was not prescribed or altered.There was no report of adverse health consequences due to the discordant ca 19-9 results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVIA CENTAUR XP CA 19-9 ASSAY
Type of Device
IMMUNOLOGICAL TEST FOR CA 19-9 ANTIGEN
Manufacturer (Section D)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
511 benedict avenue
tarrytown NY 10591 5097
Manufacturer (Section G)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
333 coney street
e. walpole MA 02032
Manufacturer Contact
eiman sulieman
333 coney street
e. walpole, MA 02032
5086604603
MDR Report Key6038229
MDR Text Key57811824
Report Number1219913-2016-00185
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K031393
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/18/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/18/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/14/2017
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number10491379
Device Lot Number052388
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-