|
This complaint was reported to codman cnv as sheath twisted on 8/2/2016.Analysis completed on 10/19/2016 revealed that the coil was compressed, buckled and bent.The event met mdr reporting criterial on 10/19/2016.(b)(4).Conclusion: the device was returned for analysis.The unidentified microcatheter and the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) were not returned.Concerning cleanliness only, the microcoil system was returned in almost pristine condition.The system was either not used or was cleaned before being returned which may have produced further damage.External examination found that the unit was returned fully sheathed and no apparent sheath damage was observed by the unaided eye.The coil has intermittent compression and buckling damage along the entire length.Adjacent to the ball tip, the coil has been severely bent.The damage caused the coil to lose its secondary shape.The locking mechanism has compression and stretching damage.No manufacturing defects were found.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (c26897) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint the report of the sheath twisting during coiling could not be confirmed.While the root cause of the sheath twisting cannot be determined partly due to a lack of clarification, the evidence as received highly suggests that there are two possible contributing factors to the procedural difficulty.These factors may have worked in tandem or separately with each capable of producing similar results.The primary contributing factor to the "sheath twisting" may have occurred when the microcoil system was first unlocked for use and the sheath was retracted straight back instead of up at a forty-five degree angle and then back.When the sheath was pulled straight back, the locking mechanism caught the inside of the v notch of the resheathing tool and became embedded.In addition, the locking mechanism may not have been fully disengaged off the core wire.The sheath also caught the v notches extended edges.This produced a binding action between the device positioning unit (dpu), the sheath, and the coil.This binding action produced significant resistance which caused the coil to have severe compression and buckling damage.This may have caused the ¿sheath twisting¿ encountered by the end user.For optimum product performance and to prevent potential complications, the instructions for use (ifu) recommends, ¿hold the introducer sheath (loosely-looped) in the left hand.Keeping the introducer tip near the re-sheathing tool, grasp the distal end of the re-sheathing tool between your left thumb and forefinger.Grasp the clear tab near the end of the introducer sheath body with the thumb and forefinger of your other hand.Gently pull the clear tab of the introducer sheath out and away from the re sheathing tool at a 45-degree angle to unlock the microcoil.Continue to pull the tab until an additional 0.5 to 1.0 inches (1.3 to 2.5 cm) of the translucent material is exposed.Gently fold the translucent tab towards the distal end, and firmly grasp the distal end of the re sheathing tool and the translucent tab between your thumb and forefinger.Caution: if unusual friction is noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system, verify the locking mechanism, or clear tab is unlocked and pulled out from the resheathing tool approximately 1in.(2-3cm).¿ in addition, without the identification or the return of the unknown microcatheter and the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if these components had any additional contributions to the complaint event.The secondary, but equally important contributing factor to the ¿sheath twisting¿ may have been due to a possible misalignment of the distal tip of the green introducer at the hub to microcatheter junction in the funnel section.This would explain how the distal tip of the coil became severely bent at the distal tip of the coil producing an angle to the reminder of the coil.This may have also produced the compression and buckling damage to the coil, but not causing the coil¿s socket ring to be pushed down inside the outer sheath as seen from binding action normally produced from the primary contributing factor.If this occurred then for optimum product performance and to prevent potential complications, the instructions for use (ifu) recommends, ¿¿additionally, if the introducer tip and microcatheter hub are misaligned, damage may occur to the microcoil as it passes through this transition¿¿ in addition, without the identification or the return of the unknown microcatheter and the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if these components had any additional contributions to the complaint event.Since there was no evidence of a manufacturing issue, no corrective action will be taken at this time.This is an initial/final mdr report.
|
|
As reported by a healthcare professional, a deltaplush (dpl10020320/c26897) sheath twisted during aneurysm coiling.There was no adverse consequence to the patient.The product was returned for analysis and the sheath did not appear twisted; however, the coil appeared compressed, buckled and bent.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were unsuccessful.
|