• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE NC QUANTUM APEX¿; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE NC QUANTUM APEX¿; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493912415250
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 09/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the complaint device was not returned for analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that shaft break occurred.A15mmx2.50mm nc quantum apex¿ balloon catheter was selected for use.During preparation, after flushing the balloon catheter, the device was loaded on the guidewire.No difficulties were encountered during loading.However, the shaft was broken 29cm from the hub.The device never entered the patient's body.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a partial nc quantum apex balloon catheter.Only the hub, strain relief and part of the hypotube were returned for analysis.The hypotube was microscopically and tactile inspected.Inspection revealed a separation in the hypotube, located 78 cm from the strain relief.The end of the hypotube was oval, as if kinked prior to separation.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that shaft break occurred.A15mmx2.50mm nc quantum apex¿ balloon catheter was selected for use.During preparation, after flushing the balloon catheter, the device was loaded on the guidewire.No difficulties were encountered during loading.However, the shaft was broken 29cm from the hub.The device never entered the patient's body.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NC QUANTUM APEX¿
Type of Device
CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6043117
MDR Text Key57927746
Report Number2134265-2016-09162
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMY
PMA/PMN Number
K121667
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/23/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2019
Device Model NumberH7493912415250
Device Catalogue Number39124-1525
Device Lot Number19509944
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/05/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/23/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/20/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/05/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/25/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-