It was reported that during insertion in anesthesia, the md was unable to "regurge" through the distal line.As a result, a new kit was opened and used to complete the procedure without issue.There was no reported delay, death, or complications to the patient as a result of this occurrence.
|
(b)(4).Device evaluation: it was reported that during insertion in anesthesia, the md was unable to "regurge" through the distal line, this issue was confirmed.One arrow 5 fr x 8 cm catheter was returned.Dried blood / biological material was observed in the extension lines.Water was injected into both lumens using a 10 ml syringe.The distal lumen was found to be blocked.A gage wire (.018" diameter) was inserted into the distal lumen and the blockage was found to be in the area of the juncture hub.Normal flow was observed through the proximal lumen.The sample was soaked in hot water for one hour.After soaking, the gage wire was inserted into the distal extension line.After several attempts, the gage wire was pushed through the distal lumen.Only dried blood / biological material was observed exiting the lumen.After the blockage was removed, the.018 gage wire passed freely through the lumen.The instruction booklet directs the user to prepare the catheter for insertion by flushing and clamping each lumen.No blockage was reported before insertion.The ifu also states that indwelling catheters should be routinely inspected for desired flow rate.A device history record review was performed and did not other remarks: reveal any manufacturing related issues.Since the blockage was determined to be dried blood / biological material, operational context caused or contributed to this event.No further action will be taken.
|