| Model Number |
LX12 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Erosion (1750)
|
| Date of Event |
09/27/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure, a patient experienced abdominal pain to endoscopic visualization of linx device beads within the esophageal lumen on (b)(6) 2016.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.Anti-reflux procedure and linx device implantation occurred without issue on (b)(6) 2012 by dr.(b)(6).A hiatal hernia was repaired as part of the anti-reflux procedure.Patient reported difficulties swallowing/dysphagia after device implant.Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) performed on (b)(6) 2016 showed linx device beads within the esophageal lumen.Uneventful endoscopic explant of single linx bead on (b)(6) 2016 by dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6).Physician plans to laparoscopically remove the remainder of the linx device in 3-4 months.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
-update regarding removal of remainder of beads from 3-4 months to (b)(6) 2017.-device evaluation performed on single explanted bead.Device analysis conducted by torax medical engineering after product receipt.Gross analysis revealed no device anomalies atypical from an explanted device.Microscopic analysis revealed all device components and assembly exhibited normal characteristics of an explanted device.No conclusion relevant to experience determined.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure a patient experienced abdominal pain to endoscopic visualization of linx device beads within the esophageal lumen on (b)(6) 2016.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-anti-reflux procedure and linx device implantation occurred without issue on (b)(6) 2012 by dr.(b)(6).-a hiatal hernia was repaired as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-patient reported difficulties swallowing/dysphagia after device implant.-esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) performed on (b)(6) 2016 showed linx device beads within the esophageal lumen.-uneventful endoscopic explant of single linx bead on (b)(6) 2016 by dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6).-physician plans to laparoscopically remove the remainder of the linx device in (b)(6) 2017.Patient reported as doing well.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
-update regarding removal of remainder of beads from 3-4 months to (b)(6) 2017.-device evaluation performed on single explanted bead.Device analysis conducted by torax medical engineering after product receipt.Gross analysis revealed no device anomalies atypical from an explanted device.Microscopic analysis revealed all device components and assembly exhibited normal characteristics of an explanted device.No conclusion relevant to experience determined.Esophageal dilation (b)(6) 2015, remaining device removal (b)(6) 2017, and patient status after removal.Partial device return.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure a patient experienced abdominal pain leading to endoscopic visualization of linx device beads within the esophageal lumen on 09/27/2016 resulting in device explant.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-anti-reflux procedure and linx device implantation occurred without issue on (b)(6) 2012 by dr.(b)(6).-a hiatal hernia was repaired as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-patient reported difficulties swallowing/dysphagia after device implant.-patient had an esophageal dilation on (b)(6) 2015 with no resolution.-esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) performed on (b)(6) 2016 showed linx device beads within the esophageal lumen.-uneventful endoscopic explant of single linx bead on (b)(6) 2016 by dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6).-uneventful laparoscopic explant of the remaining 11 linx device beads on (b)(6) 2017.-patient was reported as doing well and had no complaints after removal surgery.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|