Integra completed its internal investigation 19oct2016.The investigation included: method: - review of device history records.- review of complaint management database for similar complaints.Results: at this time, no dhr review could be conducted.At this time, no trend analysis could be conducted.The complainant did not provide any information regarding the identity of the product(s) or product family of the alleged defective device(s).Requests have been submitted to the risk management department to obtain additional information.Conclusion: a root cause could not be determined due to no product information provided.
|
It was reported via a legal allegation that on (b)(6) 2014 the patient underwent left ankle reconstructive surgery.The patient suffered severe pain and contracted an infection subsequent to his ankle surgery.From (b)(6) 2014 through (b)(6) 2014, at post-operative examinations, the patient continually complained of ongoing excessive pain occurring in his left ankle.The physician and staff noted at each post-operative examination that soft tissue swelling persisted in the patient's left ankle and foot.On (b)(6) 2014, radiological images indicated a fatigue fracture of the hardware implanted in the patients left foot.The patient sought additional advice from a 2nd/different physician and was then referred to a 3rd physician/different orthopedic surgeon specialist for corrective surgery.Corrective/revision surgery took place on (b)(6) 2014.The patient underwent surgery to remove and replace ankle support hardware, treat the infection, and remove bone marrow to which the infection had spread.The patient suffered permanent disfigurement due to the removal of bone matter, extensive pain and suffering, additional surgery, and disfigurement.
|