• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.; LEEP 1000

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.; LEEP 1000 Back to Search Results
Model Number 52969
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/19/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Coopersurgical, inc.Is currently investigating the reported complaint condition.The device involved in the complaint was returned to the customer and evaluated.Once the investigation is completed a follow-up will be filed.Reference complaint: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Review of service and repair log # (b)(4).Follow up questionnaire: "foot pedal failed to work during the procedure.Patient was taken to the or for suture placement." reference complaint: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A review of the dhr is not available but not expected to provide useful information for this complaint.The foot pedal has been known to fail due to a few reasons.The most common is the diaphragm which acts as the mechanism to make contact (for electrical current) to supply power to the unit.Air displacement pushes on a piston via the diaphragm into a switch to turn the power on.The foot pedal creates the air displacement to the pneumatic switch mechanism located in the housing of the unit.The diaphragm breaks down just enough to lose its seal and cannot function properly.The diaphragm material has been described as a rubber, possibly a latex.Given the appearance of a bad diaphragm it appears to have been exposed to excessive stimuli.Materials like latex are flexible hence the use in this application but its elastic properties can alter over time as well.In this condition the sealing properties are impacted and it will not function as intended.The root cause for this complaint condition is component related to the diaphragm.The unit was repaired and returned to the customer.Sustaining engineering has successfully tested a replacement material made of silicone for use in assembly and repairs going forward.The dfu was also updated to add a safety check.A service bulletin was issued to existing customers informing them to check for this issue and return the unit if needed.This complaint will be entered into the coopersurgical continuous improvement plan (cip).
 
Event Description
Review of service and repair log # (b)(4).Follow up questionnaire: "foot pedal failed to work during the procedure.Patient was taken to the o.R.For suture placement." (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.
Type of Device
LEEP 1000
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer Contact
nana banafo
75 corporate drive
trumbull, CT 06611
2036015200
MDR Report Key6064628
MDR Text Key59020049
Report Number1216677-2016-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HGI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K952483
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Repair
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model Number52969
Device Catalogue Number52969
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Device Age8 YR
Date Manufacturer Received10/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2005
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-