|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that during a peripheral procedure, the 3.0 x 30 mm trek dilatation catheter was advanced into the patient anatomy.An attempt was made to inflate the balloon; however, it was noted that the balloon did not inflate at all and it was thought that there was a hole in the balloon; however, no contrast was seen coming from the device.The trek dilatation catheter was removed from the patient anatomy without difficulty and a second same device was used without issue.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|