|
The device history records for the subject device was reviewed.The review revealed there were no anomalies or non-conformances generated during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Off label use due to different biologics utilized by the surgeon was reported.Attempts were made to receive the imaging (fluoroscopy, x-ray, ct) of the implant after initial surgery and prior to revision surgery were made.Images were not received; therefore, no investigation could be conducted.Device/imaging not received.
|