|
No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The return of the device is pending.The investigation is currently under way.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Visual inspection: the sample was returned.The balloon size for this product is printed on the balloon hub of the catheter and identified the returned sample as a 4mm x 20mm balloon.The segment contained the hubs, shaft, and the proximal base of the balloon.A complete circumferential rupture was observed at the base of the proximal cone.The catheter was stretched and jagged at the location of the detachment.No other anomalies were noted to the device.Functional/performance evaluation: no functional testing could be performed due to the condition in which the sample was returned (i.E.Balloon detachment).Medical records review: medical records were not provided for review.Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided for review.Conclusion: the device was returned.The investigation was confirmed for a complete circumferential balloon rupture and balloon detachment based upon the condition in which the sample was received.The investigation was unconfirmed for a break, as a complete detachment was identified.The balloon rupture likely lead to the balloon detachment.However, the definitive root cause for the balloon rupture could not be determined based upon the available information.It was unknown if patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: do not exceed the rated burst pressure (rbp) recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.Precautions: if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath/guide catheter, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the introducer sheath/guide catheter and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.If resistance is still felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter and introducer sheath/guide catheter as a single unit.Use of the ultraverse 035 pta dilatation catheter: position the balloon relative to the lesion to be dilated, ensure the guidewire is in place, and inflate the balloon to the appropriate pressure.Potential adverse reactions: additional intervention.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|