Catalog Number 1012449-20 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Kinked (1339); Difficult To Position (1467)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/19/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in an unspecified artery.An nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was selected for the procedure.While inserting the bdc into the rotating hemostatic valve, a little catch was felt resulting in a mild bend in the shaft (hypotube).Resistance was felt during advancement of the bdc through the guiding catheter, it was not moving forward properly and did not exit the guiding catheter.When the bdc was removed from the guiding catheter, only the proximal portion came out and the distal portion remained within the guiding catheter.The guide wire and guiding catheter were removed from the anatomy as a single unit and the distal portion of the bdc was retrieved from the guiding catheter.Another bdc was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported separation and kink were confirmed.The reported difficulty to position with the guiding catheter and rhv could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|