|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance, detachment of device, foreign body in patient and reported treatments appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|