MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

Model Number	9004
Medical Device Problem Code	Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Reocclusion (1985)
Date of Event	10/19/2016
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the sample(s) were not returned to the user facility; therefore, device evaluations are unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) shows the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual samples were not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study device and not related to the procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of a reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided will all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheters was used to treat the target lesion located in the right mid-distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 19 months after the index procedure, the patient's right mid-distal sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study device and not related to the procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and not available for further evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.This is one of two products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturers report number is 3006513822-2016-00207.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The associated manufacturers report number was corrected from 3006513822-2016-00207 to 3006513822-2016-00208.Analysis: the sample(s) were not returned to the user facility; therefore, device evaluations are unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) shows the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual samples were not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study device and not related to the procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of a reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided will all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheters was used to treat the target lesion located in the right mid-distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 19 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s right mid-distal sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study device and not related to the procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and not available for further evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.This is one of two products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturers report number is 3006513822-2016-00208.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the event description had the following phrase added: ", but the cec has adjudicated the study device to be possibly related." conclusion: the conclusion had the following phrase added: "but the cec has adjudicated the study device to be possibly related." corrected data: the event description was changed to reflect two devices were used in the index procedure.The udi no.Was changed from "(b)(4)" to "(b)(4)." (b)(4).Analysis: the samples were not returned to the user facility; therefore, device evaluations were unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) shows the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual samples were not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study device and not related to the procedure, but the cec has adjudicated the study device to be possibly related.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of a reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided will all relevant information.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, two lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheters were used to treat the target lesion located in the right mid-distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 19 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s right mid-distal sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed and the hcp deemed it was successful.The investigator assessed the event was unlikely related to the study devices and not related to the procedure, but the cec has adjudicated the study devices to be possibly related.The samples were discarded by the user facility and are not available for further evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.This is one of two products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturers report number is 3006513822-2016-00208.

• Brand Name: LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
• Common Device Name: DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
• Manufacturer (Section D): C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO); 289 bay road; queensbury NY 12804
• MDR Report Key: 6108114
• Report Number: 3006513822-2016-00206
• Device Sequence Number: 16311713
• Product Code: ONU
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741088483
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741088483(17)160531(10)GFYE1550
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter Country: BE
• PMA/510(K) Number: P130024
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: foreign,health professional,o
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 07/16/2018

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 05/31/2016
• Device Model Number: 9004
• Device Catalogue Number: 9040410600150
• Device Lot Number: GFYE1550
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Event Location: Hospital
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: Not provided
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: Not provided; 06/25/2018
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 11/16/2016
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 11/21/2016; 07/16/2018
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 72 YR
• Patient Weight: 90