|
No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device is not available for return.The investigation is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the subassemblies, material review reports, raw material testing, manufacturing process, and quality control inspection.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint that has been reported for this corporate lot number to date.Visual inspection: the sample was not returned; therefore, a visual inspection could not be performed.Functional/performance evaluation: the sample was not returned; therefore, functional/performance evaluation could not be performed.Medical records review: medical records were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.Conclusion: the device was not returned.Images and medical records were not provided.The investigation was inconclusive for the reported tear in the graft material.Per the reported event details, the graft was flushed with heparin before implantation.Per ifu, "exposure to solutions may result in loss of graft's hydrophobic properties.Loss of the hydrophobic barrier may result in graft wall leakage.Preclotting of this graft is unnecessary".Therefore, the integrity of the graft could have been compromised during implantation.However, the definitive root cause was unknown.Labeling review: the current ifu states: precautions: when removing the external spiral support (beading) of the distaflo® graft, the beading must be removed slowly and at a 90° angle to the graft.Rapid unwinding and /or removal at less than a 90° angle may result in graft damage.Do not use surgical blades or sharp, pointed instruments to remove the beading as this may damage the graft wall.If damage occurs, that segment of the graft should not be used.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
It was reported that during removal of the beading from the vascular graft, the graft allegedly tore during treatment in a calcified leg.Reportedly, the surgical graft was cut and the remainder of the graft was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|