Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 12/17/2009 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the ¿patient received a cook gunther tulip on (b)(6) 2009 at the (b)(6) medical center of (b)(6).¿ it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Patient is seeking punitive damages.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the ¿patient received a cook gunther tulip on (b)(6) 2009 at the (b)(6).¿ it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information was received on 12/15/2016 as follows: the plaintiff allegedly received device implant via right jugular vein on (b)(6) 2009 due to bilateral lower extremity dvt.The plaintiff alleges device is unable to be retrieved after implant of device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Explant date removed, the device was not explanted.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating: "the plaintiff alleges device is unable to be retrieved after implant of device".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.There is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmon embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Event Description
|
Plaintiff alleges anxiety and other medical problems without further details; an attempted retrieval on (b)(6) 2009.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|