Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 07/31/2007 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the ¿patient received a cook gunther tulip on (b)(6) 2007 at (b)(6).¿ it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Patient is seeking punitive damages.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the ¿patient received a cook gunther tulip on (b)(6) 2007 at (b)(6).¿ it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 02/08/2017 as follows: plaintiff was allegedly treated for deep vein thrombosis and claims to have received an implant on (b)(6) 2007 via the right common internal jugular vein.Plaintiff is alleging device tilt and that an attempt was made to remove the device on (b)(6) 2007 but the device is unable to be retrieved.Plaintiff alleges pain as a result of the implant.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating: "plaintiff is alleging device tilt and that an attempt was made to remove the device but the device is unable to be retrieved.Plaintiff alleges pain as a result of the implant".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|