Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Death (1802); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 01/07/2016 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2011." patient outcome: [pt] is deceased.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a cook celect filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot# is unknown.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374 or k090140.(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2011." patient outcome: [pt] is deceased.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information was received 02/06/2017 and is as follows: patient representative alleges filter placed on (b)(6) 2011 for prophylaxis for pulmonary embolism.Patient representative alleges outcomes attributed to device include vena cava perforation, organ perforation, and death (date of death (b)(6) 2016).Patient representative alleges no previous attempts for device retrieval.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "vena cava perforation, organ perforation and death".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|