• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CHARGER¿; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CHARGER¿; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL Back to Search Results
Model Number H74939206051510
Device Problems Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/11/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that catheter entrapment and shaft break occurred.The target lesion was located in the shallow femoral right lower limb artery.The lesion had a previously implanted stent.A 5.0 x150, 135cm charger balloon catheter was advanced for pre-dilation.After the lesion was fully expanded, the balloon could not be pulled out.The whole guide wire and the balloon were then removed however, it was noted that shaft near the hub of the balloon catheter had fractured.No segment of the balloon was retained inside the patient's body.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was received in two sections as a result of a break in the shaft.The break location was 58.2cm proximal to the tip.The shaft at the break site was severely stretched and bunched.The proximal section of the shaft break was severely stretched down onto a guidewire.It was not possible to remove the wire as the shaft was stretched down onto the wire.Due to the severely stretched and damaged shaft, it was not possible determine the location / cause of the initial wire restriction.The balloon was not refolded.No other issues were observed with the balloon and the device.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that catheter entrapment and shaft break occurred.The target lesion was located in the shallow femoral right lower limb artery.The lesion had a previously implanted stent.A 5.0 x150, 135cm charger¿ balloon catheter was advanced for pre-dilation.After the lesion was fully expanded, the balloon could not be pulled out.The whole guide wire and the balloon were then removed however, it was noted that shaft near the hub of the balloon catheter had fractured.No segment of the balloon was retained inside the patient's body.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CHARGER¿
Type of Device
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6147570
MDR Text Key61542198
Report Number2134265-2016-11167
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCN
PMA/PMN Number
K112697
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/19/2019
Device Model NumberH74939206051510
Device Catalogue Number3920605151
Device Lot Number0019164513
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/06/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/15/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/06/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-