• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Corroded (1131); High impedance (1291); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Neck Pain (2433); No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/01/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Product analysis was completed and approved for the lead on 11/11/2016.Scanning electron microscopy images of the connector pin show that pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred on the pin surface.Note that since a portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.The lead coils have a spiral/wavy appearance in some locations.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.Product analysis for the generator was completed and approved on 11/15/2016.In the lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.The pulse generator showed no signs of variation in the output signal and demonstrated the expected level of output current.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.From the data dump, the patient's pre change diagnostics from (b)(6) 2016 show high impedance of 5359 ohms with a post change of 2627 ohms.This is indicative of intermittent high lead impedance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Adverse event, corrected data, initial mdr omitted information that was known prior to submission of the initial mdr required intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage, corrected data, initial mdr omitted information that was known prior to submission of the initial mdr describe event or problem, corrected data, initial mdr omitted information that was known prior to submission of the initial mdr.
 
Event Description
The patient experienced painful stimulation in the neck after the patient was choked in 2015.The patient's replacement surgery was scheduled for this painful stimulation for patient comfort only.Since the date that the high impedance first occurred is unknown, it is possible that the high impedance contributed to the patient's painful stimulation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6149620
MDR Text Key61863510
Report Number1644487-2016-02804
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2007
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number011718
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/26/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/12/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
-
-