|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The perclose proglide device is filed under a separate medwatch manufacturer report reference number.Evaluation summary: analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported suture detachment could not be confirmed as the suture was not returned for analysis.A conclusive cause for the reported suture detachment could not be determined.The subsequent treatment appears to be related to procedure circumstance.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that an arteriotomy closure of the left common femoral artery was attempted using a perclose at device with a 6fr sheath, after a diagnostic procedure.Reportedly, when advancing the knot of the perclose a-t device, the suture broke.A proglide device was used and a cuff miss occurred.A non-abbott device was used to achieve hemostasis.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.The physician is reported to be in-training in the use of the perclose a-t and the proglide device.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the entire procedure.No additional information was provided.
|